so while researching the difference between bci & bcc (i am terribly in the 'no-clue' zone there)

i come upon this site
http://www.boa-constrictors.com/com/com.html

and i'm like okay great. it shows the difference. well i scroll down to the bottom of the page and read this:
We are also opposed to the production of "artificial boas", as it happens in the U.S. in many places. Boa constrictor with various genetic faults are bred among themselves there, in order to produce "snowboas, jungleboas, chain-linkboas, ghostboas and so on..."

This is not our thing. Therefore we will not publish pictures of such "artificial boas" on our website. For more information just click the button
which leads you to this:
http://www.boa-constrictors.com/com/...eds/morphs.htm

and at the bottom is a letter from an american on how he dislikes morphs. i'm glad that all the information on this page is so one sided the page practically leans over.

i loved this bit:
In general, the probability of two specimens with such genetic defects (amelanism, anerythrism, and axanthism are just that) to meet in the wild is almost null. The creation of such an animal is possible in a captive environment only.

This is done out of pure commercial interest, and there is no limit when it comes to naming these “artificial mutants”.
He/She kills me by alluding initially that god-forbid, should these animals go extinct, none of these animals in captivity will be 'normals' they'll all just be these hideous deformed mutant. If i were going to take a stance against a big part of a hobby that i was into, i would actually take a small bit of time to understand the process? To assume we'll never have normals of any type of snake is laughable at most.

also:
i know this pertains to boa constrictors, but i feel it is applicable to any snake we keep & breed.