albino x pastel?

[Mendel's Balls]

I think your confusion comes from a misunderstanding of how genes are strung together. Not that I'm particularly educated in this matter, but I think I can explain it....

Imagine a long string with 100 pairs of beads attached to its length...for a total of 200 beads. Each pair of beads would represent one pair of genes. Each pair of genes controls one aspect of how the snake looks. So....the albino beads might be the third pair down....while the pastel beads might be at the 54th position. While they both control some aspect of the snake's color appearance...they are still completely different genes. So a snake can have a pair of albino genes at one position on the "string"....and on the "54th position," he may have a pastel and normal bead pair.

I hope that helps some....not sure if I'm being clear or not!

Overall the idea that genes are seperate entities on a beaded string is valid simplication for Mendelian genetics.

However, I would add some things to your model

For one there is more than one string of beads. For example, humans have 46 chromosomes. What this means is we actually have 46 DNA molecules. Each chromosome contains one DNA molecule plus packaging material. Each DNA molecule contains segements that code for proteins of specific function. We call these segments genes.

In your analogy, if albino and pastel follow a classic Mendelian mode of inheritance than the gene for pastel and albino are different beads on different strings! In other words, the gene for pastel resides on a different DNA molecule or chromosome than the gene for albino.

It is possible that the gene for pastel and albino are on the same chromosome. We call genes on the same chromosome linked genes. If genes are linked than the typical two gene trait probabilties are not valid.
This is because linked genes do not follow Mendel's law of independant assortment. For two linked recessive traits, for example, your chances of producing a double recessive from the breeding of two double hets would be much better than the typical 1 in 16 chance....it would be much higher and closer to 1 in 4!

To determine if a gene is linked through breeding experiments alone would be difficult in an organism like the ball python which has small number of offspring.

[JLC]

Overall the idea that genes are seperate entities on a beaded string is valid simplication for Mendelian genetics.

Haha....coming from you, I'll take that as a sincere compliment. Thanks for exploring the matter even deeper. I learned new stuff today!

[Mendel's Balls]

No problem Judy in the Sky with diamonds.

For those more interested how linked genes would influence two-gene crosses go to this link. Test yourself and then hit tutorial for a good explantion. Or good through the whole tutorial by hitting the Mendelian Genetics button.

http://www.biology.arizona.edu/mende...cross/10Q.html

[elevatethis]

What are the odds that someone into ball pythons actually maps out all of the different traits and where, if any, might be linked?

(then, what are the odds that someone actually makes that info public....0!)