Quote Originally Posted by JLC
I think maybe you read the article too fast:





Some "local official" delcared that the snake was 48' long, etc. While the Guinness website lists an entirely different snake as the biggest. Nowhere does it say (nor has it been said since) that Guinness confirmed their claims.

After the story had circulated for quite awhile and people tried to confirm those claims, the snake actually got a LOT shorter. In reality, it was somewhat less than 30' long.
Ahh ... Still, thats one HUGE snake ... Plus, thats a nasty clean up job there. Anyone got a shovel and 5 rolls of paper towels handy?