Quote Originally Posted by rex322
you can still call them dwarf
But in your original post you said "it's not a dwarf", so I’m confused.

I would think that the jury is still out and it's way too early to talk in absolutes about what the dwarf and super dwarf retics are and are not.

From what I understand, locality specific or not, at the moment they are all classified as the same species and there are "versions" of that species that remain dramatically smaller than the rest. I think the smaller "versions" would in laymen’s terms be the epitome of what normal people think of when they hear the word "dwarf".

Herpetologists and biologist might take us down a different road in the future, but based on what we know today, I don't think you can fault a person for using the words "dwarf retic".

Just my $.02.

-adam