Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,362

2 members and 1,360 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,937
Threads: 249,129
Posts: 2,572,288
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GeorgiaD182
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Threaded View

  1. #7
    BPnet Senior Member
    Join Date
    06-07-2018
    Posts
    1,075
    Thanks
    1,474
    Thanked 2,015 Times in 890 Posts
    Images: 7
    If there is going to be AI created images posted regularly here, then I will no longer be here either.

    @gobuchul AI art is a detriment to the art industry, not a 'modern tool'. Stealing thousands of images to train a computer to be able to create your work is disgusting. There's no merit to it. If you can't afford a luxury you don't steal it.
    AI imagery is so pervasive already that actual medical journals now have to deal with the slop created being used as illustrations and making no sense because they don't have an actual artist on hand to fix the mistakes.

    The only bright side to it would be seeing that AI art cannot be copyrighted, an artist can come along and take that AI art and recreate it into a new work with a copyright.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Armiyana For This Useful Post:

    Bogertophis (10-09-2024),jmcrook (10-09-2024)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1