» Site Navigation
1 members and 814 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,121
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
I don't keep house snakes. I breed quite a few snake species (boas, colubrids), and sell them to many first time reptile owners (both online and at expos, and picked up at my home). Based on my experiences with new keepers I always recommend keeping the animal in the most simple way that reliably leads to success with that species. Once a keeper gets the hang of basic care, gets to know their animal (both the species and the individual specimen), and understands what makes that animal do better or worse in captivity, then they might consider some husbandry method that's more complex. There really is enough to figure out about keeping a reptile without complicating things unnecessarily.
I keep many animal enclosures that many people would call "bioactive", and they're quite challenging to get right; they have a lot of moving parts, so to speak. I personally wouldn't keep any species in such an enclosure that doesn't (capital N) Need it just to live out a full life cycle.
There's a continuum of enclosure styles/methods from paper liner in a tub to "full bioactive". For almost all species, something in the middle is going to give the most benefit with the least chance of adding stuff that's likely to go wrong. Using more rather than less natural materials (so, a natural substrate rather than paper liner; cork bark hides rather than plastic hides; wood branches rather than a plastic pirate ship) is a great way to improve a reptile's captive life without adding things that are possibly more trouble than they're worth. This is probably best called a 'naturalistic' enclosure.
Plants, which have their own care requirements that can be at odds with those of the snake, can be more trouble than they're worth because they're not going to give much benefit to most snake species. A snake will need to have its poop removed anyway, so the 'waste processing' feature claimed of "bioactive" enclosures isn't going to be relevant anyway (unless the enclosure is at least a handful of square meters). So, attempting a "bioactive" enclosure very often ends up being functionally a naturalistic enclosure, but one with a lot of extra elements that aren't doing much work (plants and their lighting, microfauna, fancy substrates that are more suited for the plants than they are for the target species).
Even some naturalistic elements can have serious downsides. Substrate and hides both complicate heating by being insulators, and so whether a heating device/method will work well with a certain substrate or hide material is a serious consideration. If a keeper starts simple and makes husbandry decisions according to actual needs of the animal, the road to success might be less rocky.
-
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Malum Argenteum For This Useful Post:
Bogertophis (08-26-2024),dakski (08-26-2024),Homebody (08-25-2024),mistergreen (12-11-2024)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|