Not sure exactly what I have.

[jmcrook]

is it because the morphs are comparable or complimentary as opposed to our previous Kahl/T+ Albino discussion?

I'm not trying to hijack the OP's thread so keeping this short and sweet. The animal is listed as 100% het albino. It is not guaranteed het for anything else. Add the numbers up and you'll understand why it can't be double or triple het. Time for you to do some research into Mendelian genetics and work through some punnett squares.