Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 815

0 members and 815 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,121
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Threaded View

  1. #4
    BPnet Veteran Malum Argenteum's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-17-2021
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    738
    Thanks
    1,376
    Thanked 1,672 Times in 659 Posts
    Images: 6
    I think things worth worrying about when it comes to breaking a law are:


    • the penalties for violating the law, and whether those are worth risking,
    • the moral/public good worth of the the law itself,
    • whether a violation could be a matter of productive civil disobedience
    • the public perception of both those who break the law and the group(s) that might be seen as guilty by association
    • the aftereffects of individual or group violations of the law (such as followup/reactionary, 'get-tough-on-x' legislation)

    I'd personally consider how those all play out in a given circumstance and then decide how to proceed. In all the plausible reptile related scenarios I imagine, simply following the law while speaking out about it is likely going to be the most reasonable and productive choice.

    Edit to add: it seems you didn't even ask about whether to obey or violate the law. Interesting how that was the extent of my thoughts about the issue.
    Last edited by Malum Argenteum; 12-25-2022 at 01:09 PM. Reason: hit 'post' too soon

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Malum Argenteum For This Useful Post:

    Bogertophis (12-25-2022),Homebody (12-25-2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1