Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 752

0 members and 752 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,120
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Registered User YungRasputin's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-03-2022
    Location
    Appalachia
    Posts
    478
    Thanks
    251
    Thanked 452 Times in 235 Posts
    Images: 27

    Re: Mainland-Dwarf Cross Mixtures

    Quote Originally Posted by nikkubus View Post
    Sorry I missed this before. The female's size has a more dramatic impact on the size of the offspring. I'm not sure if it is because mtDNA is what is mainly responsible for size or what. Garrett Hartle (Reach Out Reptiles) has done some videos where he shows 63/37 crosses that compare when the mom is SD vs the male is SD at the same ages and it's astounding. As far as exactly how it works, I'm not certain, if it is 100% mtDNA based, then it shouldn't matter at all how much the father has, but since we know 1.0 mainland x 0.1 SD produces something close to SD but a little bigger, it's likely to be a combination of mtDNA and normal DNA.




    Correct.

    25% D x 25% D = 25% D, and any combo where the male and female share the same percent, the OS will also be that same percent, so 50% D x 50% D = 50% D, 75% D x 75% D = 75% D and so on.

    50% x 25% = 37.5%
    75% x 50% = 62.5%
    75% x 25% = 50%

    In the hobby, the norm is to call anything 50% or more Dwarf (or Super Dwarf) but still not pure D/SD. 25% D/SD is not technically a D/SD, but you can still list the percentages.
    many thanks for this detailed answer! i suspected this but was hoping i was wrong - i would say however, specific to burms, i am going to be starting a size comparison thread between my dwarf female (75M/25D) and the mainland female i hope to get soon - my theory is that dwarf DNA is more significant in Burms than Retics but it will be interesting to see the results
    Last edited by YungRasputin; 10-08-2022 at 12:01 AM.
    het for nothing but groovy

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to YungRasputin For This Useful Post:

    nikkubus (10-08-2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1