Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 844

2 members and 842 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,100
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Threaded View

  1. #7
    BPnet Veteran Malum Argenteum's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-17-2021
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    738
    Thanks
    1,376
    Thanked 1,669 Times in 659 Posts
    Images: 6
    A necropsy by a vet would have a good chance of determining the cause of death. Given how effective this knowledge is in avoiding future similar problems, the cost (about $150 +/- for gross necropsy, plus any pathogen tests, cytology, etc) is a very good value -- a sort of investment in one's own knowledge and care practices.

    While I don't know which pathogens are transmissible between the animals you keep, since it is possible that the beardie had a detectable pathogen that didn't contribute to its death (e.g. there were symptoms but not ones you noticed and not ones that played in role in the death), the necropsy may be valuable in that regard. Whenever a pathogen is suspected, getting it tested is good practice.

    "Rescued" (this covers a range of situations) animals should probably get an initial vet check regardless of apparent health status, since they are generally less well cared for than animals acquired in some other way (directly from a quality breeder, or from a keeper who is relinquishing a well cared for animal for other reasons).

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Malum Argenteum For This Useful Post:

    Armiyana (03-01-2022),Bogertophis (03-07-2022),Hugsplox (03-01-2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1