Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 638

1 members and 637 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,117
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Champagne???

Threaded View

  1. #8
    Registered User Nakoa's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-18-2022
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 58 Times in 23 Posts
    Images: 5

    Re: Champagne???

    Quote Originally Posted by nikkubus View Post
    The color and headstamp look right for an older champagne. That stripe could be caused by a number of things. I'm leaning more towards something in YB complex vs GS because of the color saturation being more even on the sides instead of much heavier at the top, as well as the fact GS are much harder to make and not as common. Just a single copy of Specter could achieve a stripe that nice. No way to know for sure without breeding, especially with Champagne in the mix, as they are so variable.

    From the pic she does not look underweight, but I agree she does look dehydrated.
    She was bred from this year apparently, I will upload some pictures of some of those babies i think he sent me some.
    as for underweight i feel she is slightly just for her age as she is 2016 and around 1200 grams its more she needs to gain weight back from last breeding than "skinny" she was out of the group the healthiest

    she does look like something is different with her, il get some better pictures once she starts eating and looks a bit better as currently she is still refusing food. il add pics below..

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Nakoa For This Useful Post:

    nikkubus (03-01-2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1