This video is such a mess at the basic level that I'm having a hard time engaging with the content.
It's weird that the video has no proof of inbreeding or shows detrimental effects of inbreeding (using pictures of spiders and other morphs with neurological issues is not proof of inbreeding). The video kept saying inbreeding is bad and that it is happening with every recessive gene BP and is supposedly a big problem.
The part about breeding being bad because it does not preserve the dominating morphs is presented poorly. The video claims that any morph that is not thriving in the wild is automatically bad because it did not go through the Darwin gauntlet. He also said any breeding at all is bad because there isn't the planet worth of other snakes to proliferate with (causing a weaker gene pool). The video also said the proliferation of wild caught animals for gene strength is the only way to go, which would include the spider that he is so against. So many contradictions.
There's a completely different guy talking at the end of the video? There was no lead in to him. Is he reacting to the video? He's talking about points aren't in the slideshow bit and strays from the topic of the video.
The video cited a source by inserting a slide show of a review page then showed the landing page of a website. Instead of showing their content to support any points and the creator very briefly talked about them, really only saying the sources existed.
This video is poorly put together. There are a lot of talking points but the delivery is unpolished and the creator really needs a template to follow. It does not stay on topic, it makes broad sweeping claims, and sites very little sources. This video is a soap box at worst and a half hearted school project at best, not an educational one like it claims.
Reply With Quote