Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 724

0 members and 724 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,910
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Threaded View

  1. #6
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    649
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 428 Times in 263 Posts
    Images: 21

    Re: Questions about a few morphs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aziara View Post
    I'm seeing conflicting information on whether there is such a thing as a 'super leopard'. Some say there's no such thing, and some say there is but it doesn't look different from a single copy of the gene. So is there any reason to bred leopard to leopard? Will I get more leopards out of that pairing or will I get the same ratios?

    ...
    Is there are super leopard? I don't know, but maybe I can clarify things a bit. First a homozygous leopard ball python has two copies of the leopard gene. A heterozygous leopard ball python (or just plain leopard ball python if you prefer) has a leopard gene paired with a normal gene. To some people, a super leopard ball python and a homozygous leopard ball python are the same thing, and in addition, a super leopard ball python and a leopard ball python can be distinguished by differences in color, pattern, etc. To other people, a super leopard ball python is simply a homozygous leopard ball python. The super leopard and the leopard may or may not look different.

    So maybe everyone is saying the same thing--that a homozygous leopard ball python and a heterozygous ball python look alike. This is the case with pinstripe--there are homozygous pinstripe ball pythons and heterozygous pinstripes, and they look alike.

    On the other hand, maybe there is no such thing as a super leopard because the homozygous leopard ball python dies before hatching. This seems to be the case with the spider gene.

    The way to get a super leopard ball python is to mate a leopard to another leopard. The probability of a homozygous leopard baby is 25%, of a heterozygous leopard baby is 50%, and of a normal baby is 25%. So the probability of some sort of leopard babies is 75% rather than the 50% from a heterozygous leopard x normal. The probability of heterozygous leopard babies from a homozygous leopard x normal mating is 100%. So, IMO, the higher probability of leopard babies makes a good economic reason for a breeder to mate leopard x leopard and to use a homozygous leopard as a breeder.

    The above paragraph assumes that homozygous leopard ball pythons are as healthy as heterozygous leopard ball pythons. Weakling or dead homozygous leopard babies would be good reason not to mate leopard x leopard. I'd try to find out the answer if I was breeding leopards, but I come from a long line of farmers. Sunday dinner depended on making pets of only a few of the animals in the barnyard. YMMV.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to paulh For This Useful Post:

    Scale.Envy (09-08-2019)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1