Quote Originally Posted by asplundii View Post
Unless it is purposeful, ignorance is nothing you need to ask forgiveness for. All of us have areas where we have strengths and areas where we have weaknesses. Acknowledging ignorance is just taking the first step to learning. So I applaud you for not just recognizing where you are weak but looking to change that by learning. That is something to be proud of, not apologize for.

Now... To answer your question.

If the sire was an Enchi OD het Clown then genetically he would be EeOoCc. During gametogenesis, the genetic payload in the sperm contain only one copy of each chromosome, ergo only one copy of each gene. This means that the possible sperm from the father are:

EOC
EOc
Eoc
EoC
eOC
eOc
eoc
eoC

When androgenesis happens, the sperm (typically) penetrates an egg that has no genetic payload and the first act that occurs is an automatic doubling of the sperm's genetic package. This makes the embryo homozygous for whatever genes it is carrying. So if the sperm had carried the Clown gene then a homozygous embryo would, of course, be a visual Clown. Because your animal is not a visual Clown (and assuming androgenesis is at play here) then we know that the sperm responsible was not carrying the Clown gene. Likewise, because your animal is not a SuperOD we know the sperm did not carry the OD gene. This means the sperm was EoC, which when doubled makes EEooCC - homozygous Ench at Enchi locus, homozygous WT at OD locus, and homozygous WT at Clown locus.


Make sense?
In other words, androgenesis results in super forms and since she only has one apparent super form, she only has that morph (if she is, in fact, a product of androgenesis). That's what I got from what you said, anyway. Is that about right or has my simplification overlooked something important?

This is really fascinating. I wish I would have realized as much in my formative years. Oh well. Never too late to learn something new!

- Charles Eye