Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,967

0 members and 1,967 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 54,199, 06-29-2026 at 02:43 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,104
Threads: 249,252
Posts: 2,572,975
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GarlandFbj
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    BPnet Veteran JRLongton's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-27-2017
    Location
    Attleboro, Massachusetts
    Posts
    378
    Thanks
    527
    Thanked 408 Times in 228 Posts
    Images: 12
    Both your thermostat and heat gun are correct.

    The issue is that the heat of the UTH needs to penetrate the bottom of the tank and the substrate to reach the surface, where you are measuring the temp.

    The substrate is insulating the heat mat. So, naturally you need higher temps to penetrate through an inch of substrate. If you were to dig away layers of substrate and take temp readings, you'd notice that as you go deeper into the substrate it'd get warmer and warmer.

    I have a BP on a UTH right now. My thermostat reads 97F, but her surface temp is only 90F, as measured by the heat gun. So I lost 7F in heat on its transfer to the surface.

    With ambient temps as low as yours, I'd probably opt for a CHE, or RHP. Its much easier to get a good temp gradient that way.
    \m/

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to JRLongton For This Useful Post:

    Bogertophis (10-19-2018)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1