Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 533

2 members and 531 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,189
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Threaded View

  1. #3
    BPnet Senior Member rufretic's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-05-2017
    Posts
    1,224
    Thanks
    959
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 695 Posts
    Images: 11
    I have not heard of this with clown hets or any other recessive morphs for that matter, that certainly doesn't mean it's not true though. But, I do have quite a few clown hets and they are all beautiful but I would not say they are any brighter than the same combo without the clown het gene, at least not that I can tell. I'm pretty sure that most recessive morphs can not be visually confirmed in the het form. Although I have heard that some het pieds have 'markers' but I am not familiar with what it means but have heard if from enough reputable sources for me to believe it's true, I just don't have any experience with the pied morph.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to rufretic For This Useful Post:

    Joppsta (07-26-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1