Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 607

0 members and 607 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,201
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Threaded View

  1. #18
    BPnet Veteran kxr's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-2014
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    740
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 462 Times in 329 Posts

    Re: Super Champagne Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Seven-Thirty View Post
    I've heard conflicting reports on this one coupled with my own research on the spotnose spdier combo. According to Ben Renick, the spider spotnoses aren't any different from regular spiders in terms of loopiness. Also Ben Renick's spider combos don't look as wacked out as the leopard spotnose spider combos. I've also seen something called the nitro ball which is a bumble bee spotnose which looks closer to the leopard spider spotnoses justin has made. What I think happened in those cases are some sort of incubation or developmental issue. Or there could be somethinh weird who knows. I do know for a fact the powerball spider fails to thrive so we can rule out them being allelic.
    Maybe it's just me being overly cautious but even before reading that I was kinda opposed to mixing neuro morphs. What Justin said confirmed my suspicions... Regardless of if that information is accurate I'd avoid breeding neuro morphs together. Something about it doesn't sit right with me.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to kxr For This Useful Post:

    JodanOrNoDan (04-24-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1