Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,520

0 members and 1,520 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,937
Threads: 249,130
Posts: 2,572,295
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GeorgiaD182
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-07-2017
    Posts
    41
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 21 Times in 15 Posts

    Question Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Lesser)

    I have a male and female BEL, both super lesser. Is there any reason why I shouldn't breed them together to get 100% BEL?

    Thanks for your reply!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to leocrespo For This Useful Post:

    C.Marie (05-24-2017)

  3. #2
    BPnet Veteran piedlover79's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-25-2015
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    2,098
    Thanks
    121
    Thanked 1,652 Times in 995 Posts

    Re: Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Les

    The only issue is the risk of 'bug eye' but you run that risk any time you make a super lesser no matter how you make it.

  4. #3
    BPnet Veteran Oxylepy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-25-2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,383
    Thanks
    362
    Thanked 573 Times in 434 Posts
    Yeah, go ahead and breed them if you're okay to deal with the offspring. Honestly, though, I'd say it's a pretty boring breeding program. If you can get a couple other supers in your BELs (Super Pastel, Super Cinnamon/Black Pastel, etc) you have a really really strong breeder snake, because all offspring will at least be het for each trait.
    Ball Pythons 1.1 Lesser, Pastel
    1.0 Lesser Pastel, 0.0.7 mixed babies

  5. #4
    BPnet Lifer redshepherd's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-28-2015
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    3,525
    Thanks
    1,968
    Thanked 4,018 Times in 1,743 Posts
    Images: 5
    People don't like bug eyes, but it's not technically a health issue. And they actually grow out of it as they get bigger, which people don't seem to be aware of.

    Here's my super lesser now (showing at an angle so you can see how flat his eyes are) at 1.5 years old:





    And this is when he was a hatchling, which stayed relatively obvious until he was around 400g or so, I'm guessing... LOL:

    Last edited by redshepherd; 04-14-2017 at 02:07 PM.




  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to redshepherd For This Useful Post:

    Fraido (04-15-2017),JodanOrNoDan (04-14-2017),Seven-Thirty (04-16-2017),the_rotten1 (04-15-2017)

  7. #5
    BPnet Senior Member JodanOrNoDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-23-2015
    Location
    Everglades
    Posts
    3,042
    Thanks
    2,017
    Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,575 Posts
    Images: 77
    ^^^ I can still see the "defect". It definitely has lessened though. The most severe case of this I have seen is where one eye was actually larger than the other. My primary focus is BEL complex and I personally do not see a need to ever do a Lesser to Lesser pairing if the goal is to make an all white BEL. Lesser to Mojave works just fine. I am not condemning those that do, there is just a safer way to get there.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JodanOrNoDan For This Useful Post:

    embrit345 (04-14-2017),Hannahshissyfix (04-14-2017)

  9. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-24-2017
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Pardon my ignorance but what was BEL stand for?#

    Edit: Penny dropped.. Blue Eyed Lucy. Gotcha.
    Last edited by Joppsta; 04-14-2017 at 02:49 PM.

  10. #7
    BPnet Senior Member JodanOrNoDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-23-2015
    Location
    Everglades
    Posts
    3,042
    Thanks
    2,017
    Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,575 Posts
    Images: 77
    blue eyed leucistic, it has also been used for black eyed leucistic. When talking about the BEL Complex it always stands for blue eyed leucistic which includes mojaves, lessers, phantoms, specials and a few others.

  11. #8
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2
    I've seen it a couple times but I've only seen super pastel x super pastel a couple times also. It doesn't get you genetically further, that's why you don't see it often. Bugs eyes have nothing to do with it. Otherwise we would see things like super enchi x super enchi all the time, they have no issues and are a very in demand snake and we would hardly see super lessers at all

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to OhhWatALoser For This Useful Post:

    kxr (04-16-2017)

  13. #9
    Registered User jkerezsi's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-24-2014
    Posts
    82
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 58 Times in 33 Posts

    Re: Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Les

    Quote Originally Posted by Oxylepy View Post
    Yeah, go ahead and breed them if you're okay to deal with the offspring. Honestly, though, I'd say it's a pretty boring breeding program. If you can get a couple other supers in your BELs (Super Pastel, Super Cinnamon/Black Pastel, etc) you have a really really strong breeder snake, because all offspring will at least be het for each trait.
    Super pastel , cinnamon and black pastels can't be hets unless they are from some kind of recessive gene


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Using Tapatalk

  14. #10
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Les

    Quote Originally Posted by jkerezsi View Post
    Super pastel , cinnamon and black pastels can't be hets unless they are from some kind of recessive gene


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    The het ( short for heterozygous) is implied when we say pastel, cinny, black pastel ect. They are however all hets.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to OhhWatALoser For This Useful Post:

    Oxylepy (04-16-2017)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1