» Site Navigation
0 members and 1,520 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,937
Threads: 249,130
Posts: 2,572,295
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Registered User
Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Lesser)
I have a male and female BEL, both super lesser. Is there any reason why I shouldn't breed them together to get 100% BEL?
Thanks for your reply!
-
The Following User Says Thank You to leocrespo For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Les
The only issue is the risk of 'bug eye' but you run that risk any time you make a super lesser no matter how you make it.
-
-
Yeah, go ahead and breed them if you're okay to deal with the offspring. Honestly, though, I'd say it's a pretty boring breeding program. If you can get a couple other supers in your BELs (Super Pastel, Super Cinnamon/Black Pastel, etc) you have a really really strong breeder snake, because all offspring will at least be het for each trait.
Ball Pythons 1.1 Lesser, Pastel
1.0 Lesser Pastel, 0.0.7 mixed babies
-
-
-
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to redshepherd For This Useful Post:
Fraido (04-15-2017),JodanOrNoDan (04-14-2017),Seven-Thirty (04-16-2017),the_rotten1 (04-15-2017)
-
^^^ I can still see the "defect". It definitely has lessened though. The most severe case of this I have seen is where one eye was actually larger than the other. My primary focus is BEL complex and I personally do not see a need to ever do a Lesser to Lesser pairing if the goal is to make an all white BEL. Lesser to Mojave works just fine. I am not condemning those that do, there is just a safer way to get there.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JodanOrNoDan For This Useful Post:
embrit345 (04-14-2017),Hannahshissyfix (04-14-2017)
-
Registered User
Pardon my ignorance but what was BEL stand for?#
Edit: Penny dropped.. Blue Eyed Lucy. Gotcha.
Last edited by Joppsta; 04-14-2017 at 02:49 PM.
-
-
blue eyed leucistic, it has also been used for black eyed leucistic. When talking about the BEL Complex it always stands for blue eyed leucistic which includes mojaves, lessers, phantoms, specials and a few others.
-
-
I've seen it a couple times but I've only seen super pastel x super pastel a couple times also. It doesn't get you genetically further, that's why you don't see it often. Bugs eyes have nothing to do with it. Otherwise we would see things like super enchi x super enchi all the time, they have no issues and are a very in demand snake and we would hardly see super lessers at all
-
The Following User Says Thank You to OhhWatALoser For This Useful Post:
-
Registered User
Re: Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Les
 Originally Posted by Oxylepy
Yeah, go ahead and breed them if you're okay to deal with the offspring. Honestly, though, I'd say it's a pretty boring breeding program. If you can get a couple other supers in your BELs (Super Pastel, Super Cinnamon/Black Pastel, etc) you have a really really strong breeder snake, because all offspring will at least be het for each trait.
Super pastel , cinnamon and black pastels can't be hets unless they are from some kind of recessive gene
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
-
Re: Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Les
 Originally Posted by jkerezsi
Super pastel , cinnamon and black pastels can't be hets unless they are from some kind of recessive gene
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The het ( short for heterozygous) is implied when we say pastel, cinny, black pastel ect. They are however all hets.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to OhhWatALoser For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|