Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 617

1 members and 616 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,108
Posts: 2,572,135
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 91

Threaded View

  1. #14
    BPnet Senior Member JodanOrNoDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-23-2015
    Location
    Everglades
    Posts
    3,042
    Thanks
    2,017
    Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,575 Posts
    Images: 77

    Re: Breeding Standards

    Quote Originally Posted by ladywhipple02 View Post
    The hobby already rates the animals.

    Maybe it's not standardized by a committee, but it's there: the "JKobylka lines" and "Ralph Davis lines" and the "BHB lines"... or in the boa world "Gus Renfro lines" or "Russo lines." Stick around the hobby long enough and you start to learn where the quality is, purely based on the line names. And you see these lines drawing higher dollar amounts than others because people know they're proven and throw quality stock.

    Why would you want to formalize it?
    Because my direct from Ralph Davis phantom is the smallest and in my opinion ugliest phantom in my collection. I do not even know who the original breeder was for the phantom line I am working now but he is throwing babies I would rate near 10.
    Last edited by JodanOrNoDan; 03-24-2017 at 10:52 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1