Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 671

1 members and 670 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,101
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 91

Threaded View

  1. #8
    BPnet Senior Member Lizardlicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-08-2014
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    1,524
    Thanks
    814
    Thanked 1,149 Times in 657 Posts
    I definitely agree on creating a quality standard though. Nearly every pet trade hobby has an association of breeders and a breed standard. While we don't have breeds, we do have morphs, and you might not be able to ascribe a value judgement to an animal based one whether someone likes it or not - as pointed out, some people like different things, and to return to the dog allegory for a second, I love a well bred, straight-back German Shepard and loathe toy breeds - it may be reasonably doable to create a morph standard based on traits that morph should have. It could possibly revitalized interest in single gene morphs even, if breeder start a focus on selecting one or two single gene morphs to improve the quality of.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Lizardlicks For This Useful Post:

    Alicia (03-23-2017),JodanOrNoDan (03-23-2017),PokeyTheNinja (03-24-2017),Trisnake (03-24-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1