Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,208

0 members and 1,208 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,917
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,203
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Necbov
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Threaded View

  1. #24
    BPnet Veteran dkatz4's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-13-2016
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    613
    Thanks
    584
    Thanked 571 Times in 261 Posts
    Images: 23
    I truly mean no disrespect, i know this represents an achievement in selective breeding, but am i the only one who looks at this animal and thinks that there is something seriously wrong? I mean i suppose if its quality of life is as good as a normal counterpart, then there is nothing ethically or morally wrong in producing them, and i suppose its similar to a hairless cat (also weird imo), but i just cant shake the feeling that a perfectly good animal has been bred to the point of ruin here. Again, seriously not trying to start an argument, not passing any judgment whatsoever on those who likes this, honestly.
    Last edited by dkatz4; 11-02-2016 at 10:45 PM.
    1.0 Central American BI: Irwin
    0.1 Jungle, het snow BI: Gimel
    1.0 green albino, het granite Burm: Dr. Waffles
    1.0 Betta fish: Convertible
    1.1 cats: Tipitina (Tipi) and Professor Longhair (Fess)
    0.1 Egyptian baladi dog: Toasty

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to dkatz4 For This Useful Post:

    embrit345 (11-03-2016),kxr (11-03-2016),mrobinson12 (11-06-2016),Ptshay (11-04-2016),rlditmars (11-03-2016),Sonny1318 (11-03-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1