Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 694

0 members and 694 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,138
Posts: 2,572,326
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, SONOMANOODLES
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Threaded View

  1. #5
    BPnet Lifer Eric Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-01-2013
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    4,511
    Thanks
    2,927
    Thanked 3,889 Times in 1,948 Posts
    Images: 1
    Spider is a dominant trait. This means that unless the animal in front of you is a Spider or Spider combo, it does not carry any part of the Spider gene (nor any of the quirks that come with it). For this reason, lineage is irrelevant - it's either there or its not. If lineage were relevant, there would be a way to successfully separate the Spider trait from the associated behavior. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

    Could you provide more info on the claims you've seen? Are they keyboard warrior claims or are they supported? My guess is the first, but I'm eternally curious. If they are supported claims, by who and what relevant evidence/documentation do they have? Thanks!
    Find me on Facebook: E.B. Ball Pythons and Instagram: @EBBallPythons

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Eric Alan For This Useful Post:

    nchernandez44 (09-28-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1