Originally Posted by Nellasaur
It's not the fact that he recorded the conversation that was in bad faith, it was the fact that he lied to his prospective landlord. Deliberately omitting the fact that the pet in question was a snake (not to mention that he already owned it) was misrepresenting the situation to get the affirmative he wanted, and that ain't cool, at least IMO.
I owned it but as I stated it was staying with a friend, so technically it was not actually in my possession IF you want to get technical. People have an absurd fear of snakes, so no I'm not going to come out and show my cards, I was vague until I got clarification that it was okay. He should of said no animals that can cause damage or disturb neighbors and no snakes if it was an issue. We can all look at this differently, just depends your take on it. As I said in a previous post, I don't leave my fate or my financial fate in anybody's hands but my own.
Yep, they sure do, don't they?When dealing with people the rental company that is in charge of many places that rent out, I know for a fact that place lies as I have friends who use them as well, so I'm not going to be forthcoming. It's not that I don't hold myself and my word on a higher level, I just like to level the playing field.
Reply With Quote