Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,004

1 members and 1,003 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,141
Posts: 2,572,340
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, SONOMANOODLES
Results 1 to 10 of 86

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-26-2016
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    334
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 138 Times in 94 Posts
    Kind of a complicated ethical dilemma. I see it with people who are trying to preserve "heirloom breeds" of livestock. There are pigs whose ears cover their eyes. Pigs whose fat folds cover their eyes. Pigs with such tiny legs and fat bodies they can barely walk. Chickens who can't function as chickens because of breed traits. But some people want to preserve those breeds. I don't believe that just because a breed (or morph) exists, that means it needs to be preserved and continued.

    And if a human has a genetic/hereditary disorder, it would be the responsible course of action to consult with a genetic counselor before deciding to make their own babies. Not that anyoen should force them to do so. But I would hope they'd want to.

    But if that genetic disorder doesn't severely impact quality-of-life, meh. Do whatever you want.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Willowy For This Useful Post:

    Fraido (08-22-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1