Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,781

0 members and 1,781 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,086
Threads: 249,227
Posts: 2,572,841
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, diingoo
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Threaded View

  1. #9
    Registered User BoiseBallz's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-25-2015
    Posts
    64
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 33 Times in 22 Posts
    Images: 2
    There is little use for barium in this instance, in my opinion. The mass appears to be pleural based. The long length of pleural thickening cephalad to the main mass as well as the angular margin cephalad to the main mass in combination with the lack of associated rib abnormalities (e.g. erosion, fracture, abnormal spacing between the ribs, etc), and statistics, favor fluid in the pleural space, likely loculated, and I would consider empyema (pus between the lung and chest wall) most likely. Blood (hemothorax) is also possible but a bit less likely. Solid masses aren't impossible but also less likely.

    Barium could play a role down the line in that esophageal perforation is a potential cause for empyema, and barium can show this, but I would only do a barium study to look for esophageal perforation if you not only first proved empyema, but also if the empyema recurred despite drainage and good antibiotic coverage.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BoiseBallz For This Useful Post:

    anicatgirl (08-10-2015),das_nooblet (08-10-2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1