Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 681

0 members and 681 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,110
Posts: 2,572,154
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    649
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 428 Times in 263 Posts
    Images: 21

    Re: Supers and ALS genes

    Quote Originally Posted by Chkadii View Post
    Here's a super high level explanation.

    If you think about a DNA strand as a curled ladder, a locus is a rung of the ladder. Alleles make up two halves of a rung. Mojave as a morph is one allele, or one half of a rung. Mojaves, mystics, specials, lessers, russos, etc. are all allelic, otherwise known as being part of the same "complex" that makes blue eyed leucistics.

    So for mojave lesser BELs, that means the morphs both occupy the same rung. There's only two parts to a rung/locus, so nothing else can fit there. That means Mystic and special genes wouldn't have any room, and therefore not be part of that snake's morph combination. If a super lesser was paired to a mystic potion, some would be lesser mystics, some would be lesser mojaves, but there would never be a lesser mojave mystic.

    ....
    I've seen this or similar explanation on several web sites. It is one of the examples of really wrong information to be found on the web.

    If you think about a DNA strand as a curled ladder, a gene is a bunch of rungs of the ladder. Each gene has its own locus (location, where the gene resides). There is one strand of DNA per chromosome. Chromosomes come in pairs. Each chromosome in the pair has the same set of loci (plural of locus). In other words, a mojave gene can be in the DNA of one chromosome of the gene pair, while a lesser gene is in the same location in the DNA of the other chromosome.

    Any decent high school biology text has this information. The USA National Institute of Health has a genetics home reference pdf with good information, too.
    http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to paulh For This Useful Post:

    PeterPieBaldPython (08-05-2015)

  3. #12
    BPnet Veteran Chkadii's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2012
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    431
    Thanks
    456
    Thanked 227 Times in 139 Posts

    Re: Supers and ALS genes



    Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
    I've seen this or similar explanation on several web sites. It is one of the examples of really wrong information to be found on the web.

    If you think about a DNA strand as a curled ladder, a gene is a bunch of rungs of the ladder. Each gene has its own locus (location, where the gene resides). There is one strand of DNA per chromosome. Chromosomes come in pairs. Each chromosome in the pair has the same set of loci (plural of locus). In other words, a mojave gene can be in the DNA of one chromosome of the gene pair, while a lesser gene is in the same location in the DNA of the other chromosome.

    Any decent high school biology text has this information. The USA National Institute of Health has a genetics home reference pdf with good information, too.
    http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook
    Thanks for the correction! It's been a long time since high school bio (my teacher was a bit nuts, but that's another story) and I got complacent with my sources. Since I've been learning adobe illustrator/photoshop anyway, I'll try to put together a more accurate genetics graphic for the future.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1