Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 637

1 members and 636 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,103
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Threaded View

  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran tbowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-05-2009
    Location
    Akron
    Posts
    780
    Thanks
    83
    Thanked 226 Times in 161 Posts
    IMO if you want to own hots, you should at the very least be required to take the necessary steps to procure your own antivenom for the species you intend to work with. Relying on somebody else having it is irresponsible and incredibly selfish.

    The herp community as a whole is against restrictive regulation, but this is one instance where some regulation be beneficial.

    I am in favor of a realistic permitting system being put in place for venomous, and probably a similar yet separate permit for large constrictors.

    I believe it would go a long way to protect ourselves from keepers like this. As well as the guy keeping a large Python in a 55 gallon aquarium with a blanket for a lid being held on by clothespins.

    There needs to be something in place to separate us from the people who are so clearly doing it wrong.
    Last edited by tbowman; 07-07-2015 at 10:24 PM.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to tbowman For This Useful Post:

    GoingPostal (07-10-2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1