Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 834

0 members and 834 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,908
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,125
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Threaded View

  1. #4
    Registered User Thomas Steele's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-24-2014
    Location
    Dallas, GA
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 46 Times in 21 Posts

    Re: 100%, 66%, 50% het explaination help

    Quote Originally Posted by BCS View Post
    How would that work with one of the parents being 66% het?
    So the 66% is just the odds of it being het. In reality it either is or it isn't. So the only real way to tell is if you produced a hypo from the pairing in which case you've then proven that the 66% het was actually a 100% het. Or you get no hypo and then you either got unlucky in the odds or it's not het hypo.

    So you have two cases:
    In the case of both parent's being het it's back to 66% het for the non-visual offspring.
    In the case of Fire Woma not being het hypo it's 50% het (since one parent is 100% het) for the non-visuals.
    Thomas Steele
    2.0 Normal (Columbus, Magellan)
    1.1 Het Ultramel (Francis and Claire)
    1.1 Pastel Lesser (Lucy and Ricky)
    0.1 Pewter Bee (Ariana)
    0.1 Fire (Ember)
    0.1 Pinstripe (Savannah)
    1.1 Pastel Pied (Sandy and Danny)
    1.0 Super Stripe pos. Mocha (Romeo)

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Thomas Steele For This Useful Post:

    BCS (05-04-2015),Dave Green (05-04-2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1