Thanks for the replies... Now for a follow on: When Drawing out a Punnett square that is just a statistical tool used to show the distribution of genotypes NOT phenotypes, correct? for example: Take Champagne (C) mixed with Fire (F) and Enchi (E) . Now most people who have messed with the Champ gene know it drowns out most everything, which to me makes it pretty close to a true dominant as I have been able to find; but at the very least an incomplete dominant. So mixing a CF will result in a phenotype of a C however with Enchi the CE is very apparent because those two are VERY Co-Dominant. With that said does this mean that there is a hierarchy of alleles that express themselves over others/with others/almost move to recessive status? Because in my mind as 5+ gene snakes come out, a simple gene like Yellow Belly (still an awesome gene!!) will disappear and once in a blue moon reappear almost making one thing there is a recessive gene and YB will become het Ivory? I think right now we can categorize all these visual heterozygous genes because ball pythons have been relatively untouched for millennia's, but in the next 20-30 years will we be able to?