Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 567

0 members and 567 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,200
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Threaded View

  1. #12
    BPnet Lifer Eric Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-01-2013
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    4,511
    Thanks
    2,927
    Thanked 3,889 Times in 1,948 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: What are your opinions on hets?

    Quote Originally Posted by JPerkins View Post
    well I know that they would be het or not het; but wouldn't breeding two 100% percentages together make the babies that are het 100% or only 66%? This is where I really have trouble is figuring out the percentages.
    A picture is worth 1000 words:


    In this example, lets say blue is Piebald - a recessive trait. Both parents are 100% het Piebald (not visual, but carrying the trait). Of the offspring, there is a 1/4 chance at a Piebald (visual recessive). Of the other three, only 2/3 are carrying the Piebald trait - the other 1/3 is not. Because you can't tell which of the non-visual offspring are carrying the Piebald trait, all of the non-visual offspring are considered 66% hets.

    Better?
    Find me on Facebook: E.B. Ball Pythons and Instagram: @EBBallPythons

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eric Alan For This Useful Post:

    JPerkins (09-03-2014),Solarsoldier001 (09-09-2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1