Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 614

0 members and 614 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,910
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 10 of 73

Threaded View

  1. #9
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2
    I see no reason to treat an inbred pairing any different. If issues become common, stop breeding that pair, whether they be brother and sister or 50 generations removed. If there are no issues, why the heck wouldn't you keep going? Genetic diversity is good for adapting if the status quo changes, such as a disease or environmental change. Line breeding is the way to go for a strong animal, assuming you get the right parts together.

    Humans find ways to cope with the negative traits and survive, just about every other species just lets that animal die, so our gene pool filled with negative genes that should of took out some of our lines out a long long time ago. Damn developed brain screwing up our gene pool.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to OhhWatALoser For This Useful Post:

    jdhutton2000 (07-10-2015),satomi325 (04-10-2014),sorraia (04-10-2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1