Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 691

0 members and 691 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

Banjomule (45)

» Stats

Members: 75,899
Threads: 249,095
Posts: 2,572,066
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, HellboyBoa
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Threaded View

  1. #3
    BPnet Veteran satomi325's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-15-2011
    Location
    In a galaxy far,far away.
    Posts
    6,423
    Thanks
    2,429
    Thanked 3,969 Times in 2,446 Posts
    Images: 5
    I think most of the big names will not go out and get their animals tested.
    Their logic being that they've been doing a good job so far without animals dying of IBD, why would they need to test now? Not to mention the concerns T&C mentioned and potential cost of testing hundreds of animals.
    If a collection or facility is full of carriers and animals that are positive for IBD, I doubt a lot of the larger breeders are going to announce it publicly.


    Although, ideally, I do think everyone should get their animals tested.
    It's no different than getting dogs health tested.
    I have Dobermans and I personally would not want to purchase an animal that is positive for DCM or vWD.

    I don't expect health testing reptiles to be a standard practice for a long time.
    I also do think there needs to be more research on the matter.
    But in the end, I wouldn't be opposed to getting my animals tested. I think it would be easier for smaller hobbyists to test as wel.
    Last edited by satomi325; 02-08-2014 at 04:10 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1