Quote Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser View Post
What were you able to do in photoshop than you could not in gimp? Being the nerd I am, I see gimp vs photoshop wars every so often, was curious what your take on it was? I have been forcing myself to learn gimp since it's a inconvenience to have to switch to windows all the time to do photo editing. Photoshop no doubt had way less of a learning curve and content aware fill is awesome. I guess thats the difference between a multi million dollar company and free software lol.

Picture do look great.
I like GIMP bc it's free, and fairly easy to use with a ton of options. Honestly I wasn't sure if PS would be worth the money bc it has the same features, but the features work so much better on PS with a lot less effort. I couldn't tell you why they look clearer/sharper, idk if PS does better with saving, but I did the exact same thing in PS as I do in GIMP. Brightness/contrast, a tick of saturation, paint background white, add logo, and crop.

Time wise, I would say PS cut the time at least in half, maybe more, and like I said, that's the first time I've touched PS in a decade!

Quote Originally Posted by artist&writer View Post
The pictures all look great, but the photoshop pics look brighter, cleaner and more defined.
The cleanness of the PS pictures boggle my mind. That alone makes PS worth the money!

Quote Originally Posted by satomi325 View Post
Nice. Looks good.

I love Photoshop. Its more user friendly overall in my opinion with more features. However, I do use Gimp for quick photo editing because some features are faster to utilize than PS. I mainly use PS for digital art and the like.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
I was worried PS would be more difficult, but it's certainly easier/quicker than GIMP at least for what I do.


Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2