I'm not honestly sure. I have not done much research into dwarf burms to confidently answer that question. I just know that mine has retained his small size going into his second year now with no depression in food or space. Andy had predicted this clutch would cap at 9' for males, but many that he has looked into - siblings of my boy - are still under 4-5' in length. None have been able to make that push into full size territory. When I was younger I had a normal female Burmese and she put on a foot a month without me even trying to get her up in size. So with that in comparison Id say that the dwarf blood has a more dominance effect than in the case of retics


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk