Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 787

2 members and 785 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,100
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-09-2013
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 581 Times in 459 Posts
    i think this is true.

    we have one gene, lets call it scaleless.

    and in the heterozygous form it has a few scales missing on the head, lets call it "scaleless head" or "het scaleless". very visual, no guesswork.

    and in the homozygous form we have the completely scaleless BP. we could call them "fully scaleless" or "super scaleless" or "OMFG what dark wizardry is that"

    seems to be a textbook example of incomplete dominant, or as we say codom.

    especially if Brians assessment that scaleless head x scaleless head gives you 25% normals, 50% scaleless head, and 25% full scaleless holds true.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Pythonfriend For This Useful Post:

    snakesRkewl (10-05-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1