Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 957

0 members and 957 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,141
Posts: 2,572,333
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, SONOMANOODLES
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Threaded View

  1. #8
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Leopard : Not Allelic?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheSnakeGeek View Post
    hmmm... Brian from BHB had a "super pinstripe" that produced nothing but pins long enough to convince him it was homozygous. turned out not to be. just crazy odds. interesting though. in the writing he keeps mentioning "separating" the leopard gene from the piebald. i was under the impression that the leopard gene WAS a piebald gene. just a more visual het form of one.
    where'd ya hear that, because I've never heard that from Brian.

    Some people don't get heavily into the genetics stuff, for some reason linked genes seem to be easier to understand than allelic genes, they function the same for the conversation most people have so it works I guess. Just the odds and some mechanics are the problem, but most people don't get into that far.

    I did said greg and email also, hopefully he gets back to me
    Last edited by OhhWatALoser; 10-05-2013 at 02:02 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1