Quote Originally Posted by Kodieh View Post
So is this the new divisional line in our hobby? Anatomically correct and natural occurring purist and designer freakshow lovers?

My statement is fairly valid. You're being quite the unreasonable juvenile about a physical defect you do not have any mandate to own. You are completely unaffected by it because there will be people (foolish) like you that will not work with this gene at all. It has absolutely NO effect on you. Quite literally.

Get over yourself, you're making this into something it is not. It literally does not affect you so long as you make it so.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 4
So wait, I'm foolish because I choose not to own a scaleless gene ball python? Well thank you sir! Your elitist attitude has opened my eyes to my ignorance and now I know! I can see clearly now!

And please don't put words in my mouth because this is all in writing, and it makes you look like you are digging to find reasons to insult me.

And maybe, just maybe grab a dictionary, because certain points of your post don't grammatically make sense in context; a physical defect I have no mandate to own? Come again? Did I ever claim ownership of this defect? No, I did not. I was merely stating my opinion on the matter.

And since when did having an opinion about a topic mean I need to get over myself? In case you haven't noticed, I'M not making this into something it's not. There are two majority sides on this topic; people who like it and people who don't. I haven't made it anything.


Sent From an Enclosure