Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 892

1 members and 891 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,123
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Threaded View

  1. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-09-2013
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 581 Times in 459 Posts

    Re: Is there a point to having normal ball pythons? + breeding question

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaorte View Post
    Breeding to a normal male might be useful in cases where there is an unproven female morph. The only way to prove it out would be to pair it with a normal.

    so... they aren't COMPLETELY useless, but I sure won't be keeping any around I have enough "useless" single gene males! lol
    that is not entirely correct, in the case you describe i would go for a male super.

    like a super pastel or super lesser or ivory or super fire.

    this way you can still tell if the dinker does something genetic or not, because a super male to a normal female produces uniform clutches, and you can also check if it interacts with a known gene complex


    EDIT: if the male is a very promising dinker its a different story. otherwise, breeding a normal male really does not make sense. breeding him into many projects in just one year makes even less sense, you could do that with a powerhouse 5-gene male instead.
    Last edited by Pythonfriend; 09-24-2013 at 08:37 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1