Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,287

0 members and 1,287 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,934
Threads: 249,128
Posts: 2,572,279
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, LavadaCanc
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    11-11-2010
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts

    Bought a normal with a nice belly, possibly het pied?

    Picked this girl up as a normal because of her awesome markings. Looked through the het pied marker thread from a few years ago, but just wanted yalls opinion on her.







  2. #2
    BPnet Senior Member aalomon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-07-2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,396
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 756 Times in 414 Posts
    Images: 19

    Re: Bought a normal with a nice belly, possibly het pied?

    No way to know without breeding, but normals can have those markings. This is a picture of a male I produced. He was not het pied (or het anything for that matter).


  3. #3
    BPnet Lifer decensored's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-04-2011
    Location
    Durham, ON
    Posts
    2,916
    Thanks
    2,823
    Thanked 916 Times in 707 Posts
    Images: 102
    It's possible but het. pied marking are never full proof.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to decensored For This Useful Post:

    andys777 (09-13-2013)

  5. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    11-11-2010
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts

    Re: Bought a normal with a nice belly, possibly het pied?

    Quote Originally Posted by aalomon View Post
    No way to know without breeding, but normals can have those markings. This is a picture of a male I produced. He was not het pied (or het anything for that matter).



    Ah, those marking look very very similar to the ones on mine. I will just have to wait a couple years and see what happens

    Either way, she is an awesome looking normal!
    Last edited by Mahke; 09-12-2013 at 12:20 PM.

  6. #5
    Avian Life Neal's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-23-2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    7,088
    Thanks
    603
    Thanked 2,145 Times in 1,559 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8
    Images: 1
    The only foolproof way would be to breed to prove it out. I don't rely too much on markers as they can be a false directive.
    -Birds-

    0.1 - Poicephalus senegalus - Stella (Senegal Parrot)
    0.1- Poicephalus rufiventris - Alexa (Red-bellied Parrot)



  7. #6
    Registered User jporter617's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-27-2012
    Posts
    76
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
    Images: 5
    100% hets without a doubt, comming from a visual to a normal they have white bellys with tracks the full entire length. and very dark backs, heres one boy i produced in march. piedmale to normal female
    only way to know is to prove it out,

  8. #7
    BPnet Senior Member I-KandyReptiles's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-26-2012
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    5,356
    Thanks
    726
    Thanked 2,321 Times in 1,479 Posts

    Bought a normal with a nice belly, possibly het pied?

    Markers aren't 100%.

    For you to prove her out, your best bet would be to get a visual pied male and hope for pied babies. You could go with a het to het pairing, but unless you get great odds, it may take a few years to prove her out (if she is indeed het).

    ---------
    0.1 Dog (Truffles)
    0.1 Naked Cat (Mercedes)
    1.0 Hamster (Pumpkin)
    1.1 Bumblebees (Satyana & Weedle)
    0.3 Normals (Shayla, Rita and Althea)
    0.1 100% Het Pied Ringer (Avalon)
    1.0 Pied (Monsieur Piederoff)
    1.0 Lesser 100% Het Albino poss het OG (Tinersons)
    0.1 Spider Albino (Ivy)
    0.1 Mojave Cinnamon (Morticia)
    1.1 Normal BCIs (Damon and Conga)
    0.1 Crested Gecko (Natasha)
    0.0.1 Rosehair Tarantula (Charlotte)
    0.0.1 P.Metallica
    0.0.1 A.Avicularia
    0.0.2 P.Irminia
    0.0.1 L.Parahybona
    0.0.1 N.Coloratovillosus
    ?.?.? ASFs

  9. #8
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    04-03-2007
    Posts
    712
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 303 Times in 187 Posts

    If you bought it as a normal, chances are, that is exactly what it is.

    If you want to try to prove her out for fun, and have a Pied laying around, go for it. But, I would say, if you want to go that route, Het Pied females are pretty cheap now, why breed a probable normal to a Pied? If anything, get a Co Dom Het Pied and then at least you do not end up with just a bunch of cheap Hets.

    Dave

  10. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    06-16-2010
    Posts
    47
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Re: Bought a normal with a nice belly, possibly het pied?

    Quote Originally Posted by jporter617 View Post
    100% hets without a doubt, comming from a visual to a normal they have white bellys with tracks the full entire length. and very dark backs, heres one boy i produced in march. piedmale to normal female
    only way to know is to prove it out,
    Lawl
    Last edited by BlckPhntm; 09-20-2013 at 10:15 PM.

  11. #10
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    02-21-2009
    Location
    Corner of 6st and 2ave
    Posts
    798
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 131 Times in 113 Posts
    Images: 3
    Don't try breeding it to prove it out. You bought it as a normal it will be a normal. To often people buy a normal and hope its actually something different, because of how it looks, when its not. Now I am not saying its impossible to buy a normal and it is actually a morph. I am just saying people ask a lot and it lands way way WAY more in the favor of just being a normal owned by someone with wishful thinking.
    Always be Batman

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1