Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 694

1 members and 693 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,192
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Threaded View

  1. #24
    Registered User John Woolard's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-24-2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 18 Times in 7 Posts
    Images: 15
    I know this thread is a little dated, but I wanted to chime in too because I think there is a lot of good information and interesting hypotheses related to what's being discussed here.
    From my experience working with clowns, there is no way for me to identify, with 100% certainty, which animals carry the clown gene from those that do not. I agree that het clowns often do influence the "look" of a snake, but I don't think that it can be used as a generalization for all het clowns and definitely not as a way to sell a possible het as a 100% het.
    I can lay down a few examples of snakes in front of people, some that are hets and some that aren't, and the difference may be so minimal that it could be regarded as a natural variance in the morph or combo. I've hatched out some amazing possible het clown combos that I would bet money they were carrying the gene, but I wouldn't gamble my reputation on it.
    It would be an interesting, though lengthy, experiment for someone to test their theory on identifying het clown genetics and I'd love to see what the results were.
    Good stuff!!
    Thanks,
    John



  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Woolard For This Useful Post:

    don15681 (07-08-2013),Gerardo (07-10-2013),nykea (07-09-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1