Python sausage and bull testicle?

[Mike41793]

What am I being warned for? please tell me what rule I'm breaking now? Your post seems like it could be considered "generally hostile", were I one to take offense more easily.

If someone offered me chihuahua, I would try it. I would try german shepherd too, and I have one of them. I said chihuahua because they aren't as lean. I bet those weiner dogs wouldn't be bad either.

I second coleslaws mention of horses. I don't understand why it's so taboo to eat them either.

EDIT: also, the way you italicized "I" seems to imply that I was given a warning before. Mark didn't give any, remember that's what the issue was. I still don't know what you're warning me for though. I didn't mention anything that could be considered animal abuse, like I apparently have in so many other threads.

[KMG]

I'm having flashbacks Mike. Please stop sharing your opinions and ideas here. This is not the place for your, its for others. Yours just start problems.

Although being that chihuahuas were used as food I'm not sure there is a better thread for it. That and the fact the action that was the issue was a kick I don't think there is much of a case in this thread.

I don't really think any dog would taste that great. I think I would need my Tony Chachere's.

I like buffalo burgers. Not very strange but not readily available.

[PitOnTheProwl]

What am I being warned for? please tell me what rule I'm breaking now? Your post seems like it could be considered "generally hostile", were I one to take offense more easily.

17. No posts or private messages may be made or sent with the express intent to antagonize or discredit the staff. Violation may result in heavy infractions or a permanent ban.

EDIT: also, the way you italicized "I" seems to imply that I was given a warning before. Mark didn't give any, remember that's what the issue was. I still don't know what you're warning me for though. I didn't mention anything that could be considered animal abuse, like I apparently have in so many other threads.

I meant Me, Myself and I am giving you your warning in this post. We spoke about this and I thought I made myself clear then in PMs so now I am making it a public warning so that you cannot claim to have not gotten one.

[Capray]

I would so try it!

Think about, if you werent told what it was, would you really guess it?

[JaGv]

I would try python, I have been wanting to try rattlesnake, alligator and turtle. I have also tried rabbit, squirrel, dove, opossum, raccoon, and frog.

[rabernet]

What am I being warned for? please tell me what rule I'm breaking now? Your post seems like it could be considered "generally hostile", were I one to take offense more easily.

If someone offered me chihuahua, I would try it. I would try german shepherd too, and I have one of them. I said chihuahua because they aren't as lean. I bet those weiner dogs wouldn't be bad either.

I second coleslaws mention of horses. I don't understand why it's so taboo to eat them either.

EDIT: also, the way you italicized "I" seems to imply that I was given a warning before. Mark didn't give any, remember that's what the issue was. I still don't know what you're warning me for though. I didn't mention anything that could be considered animal abuse, like I apparently have in so many other threads.

Mike - knock it off. The chihuahua "joke" is played out, and you know exactly what you were doing. You and I have never had any personal conflicts that I am aware of or can remember. Let it go. I'm sorry that this wasn't handled the way that you believe it should have been, and I'm late to the party because of work obligations and working from 6 in the morning until 5 in the afternoon at work, then coming home and firing up my work laptop until 11 pm every day for a month now.

I personally probably would have handled it differently as well, BUT - I stand behind the decision that our staff made to let it stand. In 30 days that infraction will have expired. If it bothers you that much and you can't control yourself and feel the need to blatantly make the same jokes that earned you the infraction, it will be considered disrespect towards staff. Now you are warned.

And I still like you - but I don't like your actions right now. I understand your frustration. But it's done, the infraction ain't going no where (until it expires).

[KMG]

I don't like crawfish, I think they require to much work to eat such a small piece of food.

[PitOnTheProwl]

17. No posts or private messages may be made or sent with the express intent to antagonize or discredit the staff. Violation may result in heavy infractions or a permanent ban.

Well there's your problem.

That's why everyone needs to read the TOS
and learn to edit faster.

[KMG]

I'm not worried about it. I was going to post that but then realized their is no burden of proof for yall only your feelings so I changed it. No biggie.

I tried to be a better user but my editing speed is holding me back. Darn tablet and slow swipe.

[Mike41793]

I do admit that in the other thread my jokes, while funny to many, could have been taken as offensive. I already explained that wasn't my original intent. I also agree that mentioning eating chihuahuas in that thread was inappropriate. I'm not making jokes now. This is a thread about eating "exotic" animals and he asked what my thoughts were. I'm just repeating my opinion in the appropriate thread now. I said "dogs (in general)" and then specified chihuahuas. I made no mention of animal abuse, which is what the infraction I got was for, so no robin, i'm not "making the same jokes". I then went even further and said i'd even try german shepherd too and that I have one.

You guys are targeting me when I'm once again, within the rules. This time I'm WELL within the rules because I'm sharing my opinion in the appropriate thread.