Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 901

0 members and 901 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,105
Posts: 2,572,113
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Threaded View

  1. #2
    BPnet Senior Member kitedemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-01-2010
    Location
    NS Canada
    Posts
    6,062
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked 1,795 Times in 1,391 Posts
    Images: 11
    I am going to start by stating I dislike accurites all together.

    I monator hot and cool and ambient temps in my rack. The top has both hot and cool probes, the middle has ambient air as well s the rack body itself. The bottom has cool surface probe. The rest have a travelling probe I move around where I feel the need.

    IR guns are great tools they however are not highly accurate. They have a two degree error range add the emisifity of various materials and the reflection and refraction off angle. There is a wide range of possiable error. I love mine I use them regularly I just don't expect it to be spot on it is a good general idea.

    Accurites, they have IMO an unacceptable error. The 8ºF window quoted from the specs is too much for me by a long shot. (specs are quoted in how much range over and under they could be, accurites say 4ºF over or under is acceptable.) I also have issue with the hazard presented by batteries inside an enclosure. Batteries in moist humid conditions can eak battery acid and noxious gas. I believe every keeper should have oe reliable thermometer to trust and use as a bench mark.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to kitedemon For This Useful Post:

    Gio (05-01-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1