I agree. A morph standard just won't work.Originally Posted by Anatopism
HAha thanks. I caught up between listening to powerpoint training stuff for work, then saw this after. I don't think it's a -BAD- idea at all I'm just afraid that if it were to become a 'standard' in the industry, then we are faced with other issues... or a system that is too specific for the nature of the hobby, that it creates a too rigid or limiting experience down the road. Like people who insist that butters are better than lessers simply because of their line, blind to the individual animals, for example. I've had multiple people give me a 'standard' for what they say a butter is, then when they see my lesser girl, insist she is a butter (she's not)... and love how she looks.. but once they learn she's a lesser, she's suddenly less desirable. It's silly. I'd like to see more focus on the individual animal
...lessers are better anyways...
Reply With Quote