I've got a moral question

[wilomn]

Personally, I am WAY more concerned about the fact that you say he has/had a few venomous snakes as well, but you didn't seem 100% positive he still had them, or even that you knew more than that he at some point in time had been in possession of them. It's a LOT more dangerous if those little puppies end up getting out and into a neighbors' garage, or have an unfortunate run-in with a kid playing outside and sees the "pretty snake". I know that sounds really extreme, but from the information we've been given, there's no way to determine whether this guy is a responsible owner or not. Venomous snakes are not second-chance animals, and for all we know he could have anything from a Copperhead to a Taipan. That sounds like a much bigger problem than his Burms.

And THIS, this right here, is how bruhahas gets started.

Someone who knows NOTHING has speculated that someone MIGHT have venomous and now someone else who has NO facts has an elevated heart rate and concerns that may well have NO basis in fact.

When you don't know sugar from shinola, just shut your pie hole and we'll ALL have better lives with our scaly friends.