I'm more of a reader here than a poster...BUT...

I am seeing quite a few folks comparing dogs to the Spider morph snakes. Now, if I understand correctly, the Spider's issues are neurlogical correct?

The shortened lifespan of large breed dogs.....brachycephalic dogs.....dogs that shake when they are cold because they are so tiny....hip dysplasia that occurs in larger breed at times....

These are not neurologic issues we are talking about in the dogs. Now say someone was breeding a breed of dog (since everyone is using dogs as a comparison for some reason), that all came out with neurological problems. Say they all walked around with a head tilt, missed their feed bowl when trying to eat, stumbles sideways when trying to walk......would that be 'okay'? Would that be as accepted by society?Just food for thought.

Neurological issues are one thing, but lifespans and physical issues that arise are not the same. Apples to oranges.