Mojave + Mojave = Blue eyed Lucy?

[OhhWatALoser]

I'm talking on a per egg basis- apples to apples.

I am not discussing a per egg basis so this is not apples to apples.

You cannot deny that EVERY egg has 1:4 odds of being a BEL independant of all other eggs. To say that one egg's outcome has a bearing on the odds of another egg is just plain crazy.

Never got denied, never got said, you sure mention eggs a lot

Statistically it may make sense, but we're not talking statistics. We're talking genetics. Each egg has it's own individual 1:4 odds, and you cannot change that no matter how much you would like to. That is genetics.

odds are the statistics and your still stuck on per egg... am I being trolled?

A six egg clutch should get me 1.5 BEL's if you wanna talk clutches. Does that make sense? No. That is an extrapolation of the Punnett Square, and just a statistical "guestimate", which is not genetics.

How did you pull any of that out of what I said?

You cannot apply statistics, probabilities and guestimating to hard genetic facts. .

you do realize the whole 1 in 4 thing is statistics right?