I think you're "arguing" semantics.

An argument is a discussion where the two(or more)parties do not agree. Opposing viewpoints do not mean that neither party is open to hear the other side. You are attempting to present your viewpoint in relation to what the other party's viewpoint is.

A discussion where you listen and do not present your viewpoint is not a true discussion. It's a lecture with one person presenting a topic and one person being an audience. Neither is benefiting from the other's viewpoint. Having a lecture and then switching so the other person gives their lecture does not serve to mesh the viewpoints so they can be discussed at all.

Fighting is where each person has a viewpoint and refuses to consider that another viewpoint may be valid. So I would say that you're opposed to fighting and wish that people would argue and discuss instead.

I have considered an opposing viewpoint in the midst of arguing my own... I have even changed my mind mid-argument due to the opposing person's arguments. I also have left an argument without conceding my own viewpoint but determined to look into the opposing viewpoint in order to see if it is valid... not to prove it wrong automatically. I attempt to see both sides, and sometimes I'm right and sometimes I'm wrong.

The only true time when people disagree and it's stupid to try to force the opposing party to agree is in matters of opinion. If I like Country music and you like Rap... that's opinions. Neither is wrong, neither is right. Liking morph BPs or liking normals only is opinions, not facts. Saying that morphs are unhealthy and normals are healthy is facts that you can present or dispute.