That's assuming that cheap things=expendable. What is expendable or not is a subjective value therefor you cannot determine what is and isn't expendable. All because it "makes sense" it doesn't mean it's "logical" or true. You are basing your "logic" purely on anecdotal experiences as am I. This logical fallacy is called hasty generalization, drawing conclusions on population that isn't large enough. Anyways, some people use price as a measurement of value and some don't. But we can safely assume that people who abuse animals regardless I the price are quite cold hearted![]()