Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 595

2 members and 593 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,181
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Threaded View

  1. #9
    BPnet Lifer snakesRkewl's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-14-2009
    Location
    Milwaukie, Oregon
    Posts
    7,665
    Thanks
    2,687
    Thanked 3,036 Times in 2,147 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Wrapped around waterbowl.......opinons please?

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkS View Post
    Actually I believe the correct word is resorb, not absorb or re-absorb, they all mean different things
    resorb [rɪˈsɔːb]
    vb
    (tr) to absorb again
    [from Latin resorbēre, from re- + sorbēre to suck in; see absorb]

    I believe to absorb would be the correct term, since it happens once not more than once

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by rafacacho View Post
    He´s right. Females in breeding size once a year will develop follicles up to 30mm, that´s when they ovulate only if they´ve been bred, if not she´ll reabsorb them.
    Besides being wrong on the follicle size, do you have any proof of females developing follicles every year even if not bred?
    I have had females not develop follicles at all, large females that bred and never grew follicles, so I'm pretty skeptical to say the least.
    Last edited by snakesRkewl; 10-09-2012 at 12:07 PM.
    Jerry Robertson

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1