Quote Originally Posted by snakesRkewl View Post
Please show us where some proof of these homozygous dominate snakes are, you know just like anything else, pictures or it didn't happen.
Call me a skeptic until actual real proof is shown, Has Brian shown pictures of multiple clutches of eggs with all pinstripes in them, or are we still hiding the evidence and expecting people to believe it on his word?

I'm open to the idea that any of these homozygous mutations might exist BUT SHOW ME THE PROOF
Proof? here you go http://www.bhbreptiles.com/main.aspx?Page=contact get it straight him. what he will tell you is is he breed a pin to a pin, got a male from that, that male ended up fathering 27 eggs, all of them pinstripe. chances of a heterozygous animal doing that are 1 in 134,217,728. He never thought to take pictures it looked like any other pinstripe, or if he has them he doesn't know if it is the homozygous or not, the hobby wasn't like it is now back then. Besides what would be the point of taking pictures of clutches? want to play conspiracy theorist? he can just take out the normals and take picture of pins, or take multiple clutches and put all the pins in one picture. really doesn't "prove" a whole lot when you want to call someone a liar, you are always going to find a way to pick something apart. Brian never announced homozygous pinstripe exists. all he did is tell people his results to people who asked him directly. We took his results and made a conclusion.

and here is a no doubt 100% proven homozygous dominant trait, http://www.ralphdavisreptiles.com/bi...thons_8_07.asp clutch 76. pictures and everything for you. unless RD is a liar also.

and i was going to send you a link to vin russos results with the congo gene, but he apparently has changed his site. guess ill do this crazy thing and email him about it

If the proof isn't good enough for you, sorry your out of luck.